IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Malcolm Green Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 2005-05-14 Country: Canada
⚠️ Aging Out 2025-26: Turns 20 before Dec 31, 2025 — final eligible junior season.
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2022-23 Cushing Academy NE-Prep 31 9 8 17 0.548 0.1547 0.1547 0.2509 0.2509
2023-24 Victoria Grizzlies BCHL 53 9 11 20 0.377 0.1406 0.1446 0.5499 0.5654
2024-25 Victoria Grizzlies BCHL 54 9 17 26 0.481 0.1794 0.1754 0.7016 0.6861
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2025-26 Princeton D1 ECAC FR 34 1 5 6 0.176
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.14
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.18
2025-26 · Princeton
+26.4% vs. projection

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

28%
NCAA D1
5%
NCAA D2/D3
25%
Age-Out / Club
42%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#34672
Forward overall
#2101
Forward born in 2005

D1 Comparables

Matthew Hansen
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.25 PPG
→ Colorado College (0.17 D1 FR PPG)
0.15 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Tommy Schutt
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.37 PPG
→ Quinnipiac (0.28 D1 FR PPG)
0.22 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Tyler Spezia
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.26 PPG
→ Bowling Green (0.25 D1 FR PPG)
0.15 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Matt Pohlkamp
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.33 PPG
→ Bowling Green (0.41 D1 FR PPG)
0.20 Average
NCAAe PPG
Tanner Pond
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.39 PPG
→ Northeastern (0.11 D1 FR PPG)
0.23 Developing
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Jared Johnson
Saint Mary's (MN) · 2013-14
0.407 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Jackson Leef
Westfield State · 2011-12
0.926 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Hayden Stocks
Wisconsin-Stout · 2022-23
0.739 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.