IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Luke Gramer Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Defense DOB: 2002-07-02 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2019-20 Moorhead USHS-MN 29 8 25 33 1.138 0.1441 0.1441 — —
2020-21 Bismarck Bobcats NAHL 41 7 24 31 0.756 0.2778 0.2778 0.7981 0.7981
2021-22 Fargo Force USHL 56 2 3 5 0.089 0.0527 0.0506 0.2682 0.2576
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2022-23 Northern Michigan D1 CCHA — 14 0 0 0 0.000

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

22%
NCAA D1
18%
NCAA D2/D3
32%
Age-Out / Club
28%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#7370
Defenseman overall
#1738
Defenseman born in 2002

D1 Comparables

James Roll
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.22 PPG
→ Lake Superior State (0.30 D1 FR PPG)
0.12 Average D
NCAAe PPG
Dan Molenaar
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.24 PPG
→ Minnesota Duluth (0.18 D1 FR PPG)
0.13 Average D
NCAAe PPG
Neal Goff
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.18 PPG
→ Western Michigan (0.14 D1 FR PPG)
0.10 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
Cameron McDonald
QMJHL · 2012-13 · 0.11 PPG
→ Providence (0.18 D1 FR PPG)
0.05 Average D
NCAAe PPG
Christian Neumann
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.29 PPG
→ UConn (0.10 D1 FR PPG)
0.16 Developing D
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

John Wilson
Saint Anselm · 2017-18
0.429 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Lawson MacDougall
Hobart · 2014-15
0.750 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Wilder Jacober
Augsburg · 2022-23
0.000 No data
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.