IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

John Wilson Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Defense DOB: 1998-07-07 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2016-17 Boston Jr. Bruins USPHL-Elite 35 9 19 28 0.800 0.0738 0.0766 0.1832 0.1902
2017-18 South Shore Kings USPHL-Premier 40 6 18 24 0.600 0.0785 0.0778 0.2036 0.2018
2018-19 Northern Cyclones USPHL-Premier 36 6 21 27 0.750 0.0981 0.0920 0.2545 0.2387
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2020-21 Saint Anselm D2 NE10 — 0 0 0 0 0.000
2019-20 Saint Anselm D1 NE10 FR 7 0 3 3 0.429
2019-20 Saint Anselm D2 NE10 — 7 0 3 3 0.429
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.08
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.43
2019-20 · Saint Anselm
+425.9% vs. projection

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

12%
NCAA D2/D3
0%
Club / ACHA
0%
Other

NCAAe Rankings

#6451
Defenseman overall
#1327
Defenseman born in 1998

D1 Comparables

Matt Krug
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.21 PPG
→ Union (0.11 D1 FR PPG)
0.11 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
William Eiserman
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.15 PPG
→ UMass Lowell (0.14 D1 FR PPG)
0.08 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
Brandon Carlson
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.24 PPG
→ Alabama-Huntsville (0.11 D1 FR PPG)
0.13 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
Dominic Racobaldo
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.33 PPG
→ American International (0.12 D1 FR PPG)
0.18 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
Marc-Antoine Carrier
QMJHL · 2012-13 · 0.37 PPG
→ Brown (0.04 D1 FR PPG)
0.16 Developing D
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Richard Hart
SUNY Morrisville · 2018-19
0.240 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG
Chad Watt
Stevenson · 2017-18
0.217 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG
Noah Roitman
Concordia · 2021-22
0.296 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.