IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Hunter Hady Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Defense DOB: 2004-08-02 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2021-22 Chicago Steel USHL 23 0 1 1 0.043 0.0257 0.0274 0.1306 0.1391
2022-23 Chicago Steel USHL 59 1 15 16 0.271 0.1600 0.1621 0.8145 0.8250
2023-24 Chicago Steel USHL 53 1 6 7 0.132 0.0779 0.0750 0.3967 0.3821
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2025-26 Michigan D1 BigTen SO 2 0 1 1 0.500
2024-25 Michigan D1 BigTen — 32 0 1 1 0.031
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.10
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.03
2024-25 · Michigan
-69.9% vs. projection

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

40%
NCAA D1
18%
NCAA D2/D3
12%
Age-Out / Club
30%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#17776
Defenseman overall
#3251
Defenseman born in 2004
#3861
in USHL

D1 Comparables

Neal Goff
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.18 PPG
→ Western Michigan (0.14 D1 FR PPG)
0.10 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
Christian Neumann
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.29 PPG
→ UConn (0.10 D1 FR PPG)
0.16 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
Joe Schuldt
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.08 PPG
→ Michigan Tech
0.05 No data
NCAAe PPG
James Roll
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.22 PPG
→ Lake Superior State (0.30 D1 FR PPG)
0.12 Average D
NCAAe PPG
Tommy Davis
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.34 PPG
→ Princeton (0.29 D1 FR PPG)
0.20 Average D
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Shaun Jameson
Wentworth · 2007-08
1.040 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
Bradley Robbins
Hobart · 2010-11
0.708 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Zach Dragun
Worcester State · 2014-15
0.000 No data
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.