IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Shaun Jameson Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Defense DOB: 1988-08-05 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2007-08 Wichita Falls Wildcats NAHL 49 4 14 18 0.367 0.1364 0.1350 0.3889 0.3848
2008-09 — NAHL 50 5 17 22 0.440 0.1634 0.1536 0.4659 0.4379
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2012-13 Wentworth D3 CNE SR 28 5 22 27 0.964
2011-12 Wentworth D3 CNE JR 29 5 20 25 0.862
2010-11 Wentworth D3 CNE SO 23 5 12 17 0.739
2009-10 Wentworth D3 — FR 25 9 17 26 1.040
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.14
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
1.04
2009-10 · Wentworth
+653.6% vs. projection

NCAAe Rankings

#6956
Defenseman overall
#1101
Defenseman born in 1988
#3125
in NAHL

D1 Comparables

Jake Flynn
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.39 PPG
→ UConn (0.30 D1 FR PPG)
0.14 Strong D
NCAAe PPG
Casey Nelson
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.57 PPG
→ Minnesota State (0.26 D1 FR PPG)
0.20 Average D
NCAAe PPG
Matt Krug
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.21 PPG
→ Union (0.11 D1 FR PPG)
0.12 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
William Eiserman
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.15 PPG
→ UMass Lowell (0.14 D1 FR PPG)
0.09 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
Brandon Carlson
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.24 PPG
→ Alabama-Huntsville (0.11 D1 FR PPG)
0.14 Developing D
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Josh Giacomin
Lake Forest · 2017-18
0.538 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Spencer Flansburg
SUNY Brockport · 2022-23
0.520 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Brendan Turner
Manhattanville · 2008-09
0.000 No data
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.