← New Search ↗ Social Card

Josh Giacomin Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 1997-07-21 Country: Canada
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2014-15 Lloydminster Bobcats AJHL 2 1 0 1 0.500 0.1670 0.1800 0.4642 0.5004
2015-16 AJHL 50 8 17 25 0.500 0.1670 0.1723 0.4642 0.4788
2016-17 Calgary Canucks AJHL 54 19 19 38 0.704 0.2350 0.2310 0.6532 0.6420
2017-18 Calgary Canucks AJHL 53 17 26 43 0.811 0.2710 0.2511 0.7531 0.6978
Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2021-22 Lake Forest D3 NCHA SR 25 11 21 32 1.280
2020-21 Lake Forest D3 NCHA JR 6 0 0 0 0.000
2019-20 Lake Forest D3 NCHA SO 22 15 16 31 1.409
2018-19 Lake Forest D3 NCHA FR 26 9 5 14 0.538
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.21
before college
Actual FR PPG
0.54
2018-19 · Lake Forest
+158.8% vs. projection

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

22%
NCAA D1
40%
NCAA D2/D3
38%
Age-Out / Club
0%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#16097
Forward overall
#661
Forward born in 1997
#743
in AJHL

D1 Comparables

NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.66 PPG
→ Lake Superior State (0.14 D1 FR PPG)
0.23 Developing
NCAAe PPG
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.65 PPG
→ Alabama-Huntsville (0.11 D1 FR PPG)
0.23 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.43 PPG
→ St. Lawrence (0.30 D1 FR PPG)
0.25 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.36 PPG
→ Union (0.68 D1 FR PPG)
0.21 Strong
NCAAe PPG
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.78 PPG
→ Army (0.52 D1 FR PPG)
0.27 Average
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

St. Thomas · 2017-18
0.885 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Plymouth State · 2021-22
0.760 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Canton · 2024-25
0.720 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.