← New Search ↗ Social Card

Spencer Flansburg Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 2002-07-10 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2019-20 Connecticut Jr. Rangers NCDC 38 4 4 8 0.210 0.0858 0.0858 0.1692 0.1692
2020-21 Connecticut Jr. Rangers NCDC 32 3 6 9 0.281 0.1146 0.1146 0.2260 0.2260
2021-22 Connecticut Jr. Rangers NCDC 49 8 27 35 0.714 0.2912 0.2909 0.5742 0.5736
2022-23 Connecticut Jr. Rangers NCDC 44 16 21 37 0.841 0.3428 0.3281
Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2025-26 SUNY Brockport D3 SUNYAC JR 23 1 4 5 0.217
2024-25 SUNY Brockport D3 SUNYAC SO 25 5 3 8 0.320
2023-24 SUNY Brockport D3 SUNYAC FR 25 4 9 13 0.520
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.27
before college
Actual FR PPG
0.52
2023-24 · SUNY Brockport
+94.0% vs. projection

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

30%
NCAA D2/D3
0%
Club / ACHA
0%
Other

NCAAe Rankings

#8707
Forward overall
#416
Forward born in 2002

D1 Comparables

NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.93 PPG
→ Nebraska Omaha (0.22 D1 FR PPG)
0.32 Developing
NCAAe PPG
NAHL · 2012-13 · 1.06 PPG
→ Niagara (0.58 D1 FR PPG)
0.36 Strong
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.43 PPG
→ St. Lawrence (0.30 D1 FR PPG)
0.23 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.50 PPG
→ Brown (0.10 D1 FR PPG)
0.27 Developing
NCAAe PPG
NAHL · 2012-13 · 1.03 PPG
→ Nebraska Omaha (0.06 D1 FR PPG)
0.36 Developing
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Anna Maria · 2018-19
0.000 No data
actual D2/3 PPG
St. Thomas · 2016-17
0.885 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Hobart · 2010-11
0.708 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.