IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Cory Wilson Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 1981-10-18 Country: Canada
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2000-01 Calgary Royals AJHL 52 21 29 50 0.962 0.3225 0.3278 0.8898 0.9045
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2005-06 Lake Forest D3 NCHA SR 26 7 5 12 0.462
2004-05 Lake Forest D3 NCHA JR 26 10 4 14 0.538
2003-04 Lake Forest D3 NCHA SO 21 3 8 11 0.524
2002-03 Lake Forest D3 NCHA FR 26 12 7 19 0.731
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.28
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.73
2002-03 · Lake Forest
+160.4% vs. projection

NCAAe Rankings

#14517
Forward overall
#437
Forward born in 1981
#237
in AJHL

D1 Comparables

Kyle Osterberg
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.52 PPG
→ Minnesota Duluth (0.77 D1 FR PPG)
0.31 Strong
NCAAe PPG
Thomas Ebbing
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.45 PPG
→ Michigan State (0.25 D1 FR PPG)
0.27 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Jason Salvaggio
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.65 PPG
→ New Hampshire (0.11 D1 FR PPG)
0.39 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Tony Calderone
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.69 PPG
→ Michigan (0.32 D1 FR PPG)
0.41 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Mitch Hults
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.46 PPG
→ Lake Superior State (0.50 D1 FR PPG)
0.28 Average
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Devin Niles
Fitchburg State · 2024-25
1.500 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
Tyson Gilmour
SUNY Geneseo · 2016-17
0.762 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Hunter Stewart
Marian · 2011-12
0.741 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.