← New Search ↗ Social Card

Shaun McEwen Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Defense DOB: 2004-01-21 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2020-21 Maine Nordiques NAHL 2 1 1 2 1.000 0.3674 0.3674 1.0555 1.0555
2021-22 Tri-City Storm USHL 42 0 1 1 0.024 0.0140 0.0145 0.0715 0.0742
2022-23 Tri-City Storm USHL 33 2 8 10 0.303 0.1787 0.1763 0.9100 0.8975
2023-24 Tri-City Storm USHL 59 2 14 16 0.271 0.1600 0.1499 0.8145 0.7629
2024-25 Tri-City Storm USHL 57 7 25 32 0.561 0.3312 0.2933 1.6861 1.4933
Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2025-26 Miami D1 NCHC FR 35 2 6 8 0.229
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.22
before college
Actual FR PPG
0.23
2025-26 · Miami
+2.6% vs. projection

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

65%
NCAA D1
15%
NCAA D2/D3
5%
Age-Out / Club
15%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#4486
Defenseman overall
#1149
Defenseman born in 2004

D1 Comparables

QMJHL · 2012-13 · 0.37 PPG
→ Brown (0.04 D1 FR PPG)
0.16 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.33 PPG
→ American International (0.12 D1 FR PPG)
0.18 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.45 PPG
→ Ohio State (0.50 D1 FR PPG)
0.24 Elite D
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.79 PPG
→ North Dakota (0.51 D1 FR PPG)
0.43 Elite D
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.41 PPG
→ Bowling Green
0.22 No data
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Neumann · 2023-24
1.308 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
St. Scholastica · 2004-05
1.111 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
UMass Boston · 2015-16
1.600 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.