IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Rob Sirianni Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 1983-10-31 Country: Canada
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2000-01 Bonnyville Pontiacs AJHL 3 0 0 0 0.000 — — — —
2002-03 Bonnyville Pontiacs AJHL 62 48 42 90 1.452 0.4816 0.5005 1.3453 1.3980
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2006-07 Bemidji State D1 — SR 33 11 18 29 0.879
2005-06 Bemidji State D1 — JR 32 16 13 29 0.906
2004-05 Bemidji State D1 — SO 37 13 12 25 0.676
2003-04 Bemidji State D1 — FR 29 8 10 18 0.621
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.47
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.62
2003-04 · Bemidji State
+33.2% vs. projection

NCAAe Rankings

#5930
Forward overall
#207
Forward born in 1983
#42
in AJHL

D1 Comparables

Luke Johnson
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.81 PPG
→ North Dakota (0.50 D1 FR PPG)
0.50 Average
NCAAe PPG
Tony Calderone
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.69 PPG
→ Michigan (0.32 D1 FR PPG)
0.43 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Jason Salvaggio
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.65 PPG
→ New Hampshire (0.11 D1 FR PPG)
0.41 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Alex Roos
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.73 PPG
→ Colorado College (0.49 D1 FR PPG)
0.46 Average
NCAAe PPG
C.J. Smith
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.98 PPG
→ UMass Lowell (0.90 D1 FR PPG)
0.42 Elite
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Mickey Gilchrist
Middlebury · 2002-03
1.000 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
Ryan Howe
Fitchburg State · 2024-25
0.700 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Joshua Burke
Amherst · 2018-19
0.692 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.