IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Charlie Kinsman Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Defense DOB: 2005-03-17 Country: USA
⚠️ Aging Out 2025-26: Turns 20 before Dec 31, 2025 — final eligible junior season.
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2021-22 Tri-City Storm USHL 2 0 0 0 0.000 — — — —
2022-23 Tri-City Storm USHL 62 4 7 11 0.177 0.1090 0.1138 0.5227 0.5457
2023-24 Tri-City Storm USHL 60 3 17 20 0.333 0.2049 0.2037 0.9820 0.9764
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2025-26 Vermont D1 HockeyEast SO 16 0 0 0 0.000
2024-25 Vermont D1 HockeyEast — 26 1 1 2 0.077
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.16
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.08
2024-25 · Vermont
-51.4% vs. projection

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

78%
NCAA D1
8%
NCAA D2/D3
10%
Age-Out / Club
5%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#9207
Defenseman overall
#2036
Defenseman born in 2005
#3155
in USHL

D1 Comparables

Clay Anderson
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.38 PPG
→ Harvard (0.21 D1 FR PPG)
0.23 Average D
NCAAe PPG
Tim Davison
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.23 PPG
→ Wisconsin
0.14 No data
NCAAe PPG
Justin Woods
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.32 PPG
→ Alaska Fairbanks (0.18 D1 FR PPG)
0.19 Average D
NCAAe PPG
Garret Cockerill
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.26 PPG
→ Northeastern (0.41 D1 FR PPG)
0.16 Strong D
NCAAe PPG
Zach Frye
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.19 PPG
→ Alaska Fairbanks (0.28 D1 FR PPG)
0.12 Average D
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Bryan Tang
Skidmore · 2023-24
0.571 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Mark Mazzetti
Elmira · 2002-03
0.565 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Arlen Marshall
Manhattanville · 2003-04
0.840 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.