IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Anthony Cosmano Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 1985-01-13 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2001-02 Sioux Falls Stampede USHL 1 0 0 0 0.000 — — — —
2002-03 Sioux Falls Stampede USHL 59 11 14 25 0.424 0.2499 0.2624 1.2725 1.3359
2003-04 — USHL 42 5 14 19 0.452 0.2669 0.2661 1.3587 1.3548
2004-05 Billings Bulls NAHL 54 11 22 33 0.611 0.2245 0.2154 0.6450 0.6188
2005-06 Chicago Steel USHL 10 0 0 0 0.000 — — — —
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2009-10 UMass Boston D3 NEHC SR 19 4 6 10 0.526
2008-09 UMass Boston D3 NEHC JR 13 3 0 3 0.231
2007-08 UMass Boston D3 NEHC SO 18 1 6 7 0.389
2006-07 Wisconsin-Superior D3 WIAC FR 9 0 1 1 0.111
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.20
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.11
2006-07 · Wisconsin-Superior
-44.9% vs. projection

NCAAe Rankings

#36664
Forward overall
#1150
Forward born in 1985
#3309
in USHL

D1 Comparables

Cullen Hurley
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.38 PPG
→ Wisconsin
0.21 No data
NCAAe PPG
Max Birkinbine
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.46 PPG
→ Air Force (0.14 D1 FR PPG)
0.25 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Alexander Dahl
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.38 PPG
→ St. Lawrence (0.30 D1 FR PPG)
0.21 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Ryan Siiro
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.52 PPG
→ Princeton (0.38 D1 FR PPG)
0.29 Average
NCAAe PPG
Tyler Deresky
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.79 PPG
→ Bentley (0.19 D1 FR PPG)
0.28 Developing
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Steven Sleep
St. Norbert · 2003-04
0.516 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Jason Fransky
Elmira · 2005-06
0.000 No data
actual D2/3 PPG
John Doyle
SUNY Morrisville · 2011-12
0.875 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.