icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
| Season | Team | League | GP | G | A | Pts | PPG | NCAAe-PPG | Age-Adj | D3e-PPG | Age-Adj |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2001-02 | Sioux Falls Stampede | USHL | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.000 | — | — | — | — |
| 2002-03 | Sioux Falls Stampede | USHL | 59 | 11 | 14 | 25 | 0.424 | 0.2698 | 0.2832 | 1.2697 | 1.3330 |
| 2003-04 | — | USHL | 42 | 5 | 14 | 19 | 0.452 | 0.2881 | 0.2873 | 1.3557 | 1.3518 |
| 2004-05 | Billings Bulls | NAHL | 54 | 11 | 22 | 33 | 0.611 | 0.2269 | 0.2177 | 0.6470 | 0.6208 |
| 2005-06 | Chicago Steel | USHL | 10 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.000 | — | — | — | — |
| Season | School | Div | Conference | Year | GP | G | A | Pts | PPG |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2009-10 | UMass Boston | D3 | — | SR | 19 | 4 | 6 | 10 | 0.526 |
| 2008-09 | UMass Boston | D3 | — | JR | 13 | 3 | 0 | 3 | 0.231 |
| 2007-08 | UMass Boston | D3 | — | SO | 18 | 1 | 6 | 7 | 0.389 |
| 2006-07 | Wisconsin-Superior | D3 | — | FR | 9 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.111 |
How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.
Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.