← New Search ↗ Social Card

Ty Hanson Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Defense DOB: 2005-04-21 Country: USA
⚠️ Aging Out 2025-26: Turns 20 before Dec 31, 2025 — final eligible junior season.
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2020-21 Hermantown USHS-MN 20 9 19 28 1.400 0.1725 0.1725 0.3401 0.3401
2021-22 Hermantown USHS-MN 31 15 30 45 1.452 0.1788 0.1788
2022-23 Sioux City Musketeers USHL 54 4 21 25 0.463 0.2731 0.2864 1.3641 1.4305
2023-24 Sioux City Musketeers USHL 59 10 37 47 0.797 0.4699 0.4695 2.3469 2.3447
Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2025-26 Minnesota Duluth D1 NCHC SO 40 10 26 36 0.900
2024-25 Minnesota D1 BigTen 36 4 10 14 0.389
2024-25 Minnesota Duluth D1 NCHC 36 4 10 14 0.389
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.37
before college
Actual FR PPG
0.39
2024-25 · Minnesota
+4.0% vs. projection

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

80%
NCAA D1
0%
NCAA D2/D3
8%
Age-Out / Club
12%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#1726
Defenseman overall
#360
Defenseman born in 2005

D1 Comparables

USHL · 2012-13 · 0.55 PPG
→ St. Lawrence (0.95 D1 FR PPG)
0.32 Elite D
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.62 PPG
→ New Hampshire (0.10 D1 FR PPG)
0.36 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.65 PPG
→ Ferris State (0.35 D1 FR PPG)
0.37 Strong D
NCAAe PPG
WHL · 2012-13 · 0.74 PPG
→ Hamline (0.28 D1 FR PPG)
0.35 Average D
NCAAe PPG
NTDP-U18 · 2012-13 · 0.55 PPG
→ Denver (0.42 D1 FR PPG)
0.39 Strong D
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Southern New Hampshire · 2016-17
0.593 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Elmira · 2014-15
0.800 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Wilkes · 2016-17
1.385 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.