← New Search ↗ Social Card

James Hagens Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 2006-11-03 Country: USA
2025 NHL Draft Round 1, Pick #7  ·  Boston Bruins Boston Bruins
Signed Professionally

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2022-23 NTDP-U18 60 33 52 85 1.417 1.0985 1.1541 5.2728 5.5398
2023-24 NTDP-U18 58 39 63 102 1.759 1.3636 1.3627 6.5453 6.5408
Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2025-26 Boston College D1 HockeyEast SO 34 23 24 47 1.382
2024-25 Boston College D1 HockeyEast 37 11 26 37 1.000
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
1.37
before college
Actual FR PPG
1.00
2024-25 · Boston College
-26.9% vs. projection

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 20 comparables)

🏒 NHL / Pro Track — production profile is consistent with players who bypassed or minimized college hockey
0%
NCAA D1
0%
NCAA D2/D3
100%
NHL / Pro

NCAAe Rankings

D1 Comparables

NTDP-U18 · 2012-13 · 2.00 PPG
→ Minnesota (0.22 D1 FR PPG)
1.49 Developing
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

St. Scholastica · 2018-19
1.636 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
Neumann · 2003-04
1.800 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
St. Scholastica · 2018-19
1.636 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.