← New Search ↗ Social Card

Derrick Burnett Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 1987-03-26 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2005-06 Okotoks Oilers AJHL 59 17 21 38 0.644 0.2137 0.2170 0.5970 0.6063
2006-07 Okotoks Oilers AJHL 58 19 42 61 1.052 0.3490 0.3384 0.9747 0.9450
Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2010-11 Air Force D1 AHA SR 36 8 27 35 0.972
2009-10 Air Force D1 AHA JR 37 10 23 33 0.892
2008-09 Air Force D1 AHA SO 39 8 16 24 0.615
2007-08 Air Force D1 AHA FR 37 7 19 26 0.703
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.25
before college
Actual FR PPG
0.70
2007-08 · Air Force
+183.2% vs. projection

NCAAe Rankings

#16324
Forward overall
#551
Forward born in 1987
#394
in AJHL

D1 Comparables

USHL · 2012-13 · 0.59 PPG
→ Maine (0.54 D1 FR PPG)
0.34 Average
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.60 PPG
→ Princeton (0.30 D1 FR PPG)
0.35 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.64 PPG
→ Bemidji State (0.10 D1 FR PPG)
0.37 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.51 PPG
→ Cornell (0.10 D1 FR PPG)
0.29 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.45 PPG
→ Denver (0.14 D1 FR PPG)
0.26 Developing
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Wisconsin-Superior · 2004-05
1.038 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
Southern New Hampshire · 2016-17
0.333 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG
Wisconsin-Superior · 2004-05
1.111 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.