IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

George Fegaras Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Defense DOB: 2004-04-26 Country: Canada
2022 NHL Draft Round 3, Pick #83  ·  Dallas Stars Dallas Stars
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2020-21 — OJHL 0 0 0 0 0.000 — — — —
2021-22 — OJHL 52 13 35 48 0.923 0.2773 0.2958 0.6319 0.6741
2022-23 — USHL 61 4 23 27 0.443 0.2721 0.2719 1.3040 1.3033
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2025-26 Cornell D1 ECAC JR 34 5 16 21 0.618
2024-25 Cornell D1 ECAC SO 30 1 13 14 0.467
2023-24 Cornell D1 ECAC FR 33 3 4 7 0.212
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.27
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.21
2023-24 · Cornell
-20.2% vs. projection

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

85%
NCAA D1
0%
NCAA D2/D3
12%
Age-Out / Club
2%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#3663
Defenseman overall
#941
Defenseman born in 2004

D1 Comparables

Jeff Taylor
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.47 PPG
→ Union (0.39 D1 FR PPG)
0.29 Strong D
NCAAe PPG
Matt Benning
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.46 PPG
→ Northeastern (0.39 D1 FR PPG)
0.28 Strong D
NCAAe PPG
Jaccob Slavin
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.53 PPG
→ Colorado College (0.78 D1 FR PPG)
0.33 Elite D
NCAAe PPG
Gavin Bayreuther
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.55 PPG
→ St. Lawrence (0.95 D1 FR PPG)
0.34 Elite D
NCAAe PPG
Ian Brady
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.53 PPG
→ Nebraska Omaha (0.64 D1 FR PPG)
0.33 Elite D
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Josh Hechter
Saint Anselm · 2000-01
1.375 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
Ryan Busby
SUNY Plattsburgh · 2001-02
0.903 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Sam Ciappa
St. John Fisher · 2022-23
0.913 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.