IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Nicholas Petriello Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 1986-04-09 Country: Canada
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2004-05 Burlington Cougars OJHL 48 19 34 53 1.104 0.3085 0.3044 0.7620 0.7518
2005-06 Burlington Cougars OJHL 9 1 2 3 0.333 0.0931 0.0884 0.2300 0.2184
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2010-11 Buffalo State D3 SUNYAC SR 25 9 21 30 1.200
2009-10 Buffalo State D3 — JR 25 15 13 28 1.120
2008-09 Buffalo State D3 — SO 25 16 29 45 1.800
2007-08 Buffalo State D3 — FR 25 12 18 30 1.200
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.15
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
1.20
2007-08 · Buffalo State
+702.1% vs. projection

NCAAe Rankings

#9870
Forward overall
#392
Forward born in 1986
#429
in OJHL

D1 Comparables

Ben Ostlie
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.23 PPG
→ Notre Dame
0.14 No data
NCAAe PPG
Mike Robinson
OHL · 2012-13 · 0.19 PPG
→ New Hampshire
0.11 No data
NCAAe PPG
Stanislav Dzakhov
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.27 PPG
→ Niagara (0.44 D1 FR PPG)
0.16 Average
NCAAe PPG
Ryan Dau
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.41 PPG
→ Air Force (0.25 D1 FR PPG)
0.15 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Sami Salminen
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.56 PPG
→ Northern Michigan (0.34 D1 FR PPG)
0.21 Developing
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Tyson Kirkby
SUNY Oswego · 2016-17
0.300 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG
Grant Rinke
Salve Regina · 2017-18
0.000 No data
actual D2/3 PPG
Brandon Turer
Milwaukee School of Engineering · 2017-18
0.333 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.