← New Search ↗ Social Card

Brandon Turer Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 1998-04-13 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2017-18 East Coast Wizards EHL 40 6 20 26 0.650 0.1502 0.1497 0.3180 0.3169
Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2021-22 Milwaukee School of Engineering D3 NCHA SR 19 0 1 1 0.053
2020-21 Milwaukee School of Engineering D1 NCHA JR 19 3 1 4 0.210
2020-21 Milwaukee School of Engineering D3 NCHA JR 19 3 1 4 0.210
2019-20 Milwaukee School of Engineering D1 NCHA SO 20 2 7 9 0.450
2019-20 Milwaukee School of Engineering D3 NCHA SO 20 2 7 9 0.450
2018-19 Milwaukee School of Engineering D1 NCHA FR 21 4 3 7 0.333
2018-19 Milwaukee School of Engineering D3 NCHA FR 21 4 3 7 0.333
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.13
before college
Actual FR PPG
0.33
2018-19 · Milwaukee School of Engineering
+160.2% vs. projection

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

5%
NCAA D2/D3
0%
Club / ACHA
80%
Other

NCAAe Rankings

#24497
Forward overall
#1186
Forward born in 1998
#627
in EHL

D1 Comparables

USHL · 2012-13 · 0.23 PPG
→ Notre Dame
0.13 No data
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.21 PPG
→ Northeastern
0.12 No data
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.27 PPG
→ Niagara (0.44 D1 FR PPG)
0.15 Average
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.25 PPG
→ Colorado College (0.17 D1 FR PPG)
0.14 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.37 PPG
→ Quinnipiac (0.28 D1 FR PPG)
0.21 Developing
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Southern New Hampshire · 2017-18
0.593 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Saint John's · 2012-13
0.522 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Manhattanville · 2011-12
0.407 Average
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.