IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Teagan Waugh Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 1992-04-16 Country: Canada
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2009-10 — BCHL 32 3 10 13 0.406 0.1581 0.1689 0.5924 0.6330
2010-11 Powell River Kings BCHL 42 10 13 23 0.548 0.2131 0.2177 0.7986 0.8159
2011-12 Powell River Kings BCHL 57 22 23 45 0.789 0.3073 0.2971 1.1513 1.1129
2012-13 Powell River Kings BCHL 38 4 15 19 0.500 0.1946 0.1789 0.7291 0.6703
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2016-17 Manhattanville D3 UCHC SR 25 7 6 13 0.520
2015-16 Manhattanville D3 UCHC JR 26 5 12 17 0.654
2014-15 Manhattanville D3 UCHC SO 25 10 6 16 0.640
2013-14 Manhattanville D3 UCHC FR 27 4 7 11 0.407
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.19
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.41
2013-14 · Manhattanville
+110.4% vs. projection

NCAAe Rankings

#16229
Forward overall
#687
Forward born in 1992
#1408
in BCHL

D1 Comparables

Bob Kinne
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.48 PPG
→ Bemidji State (0.12 D1 FR PPG)
0.17 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Bradley Duwe
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.65 PPG
→ Alaska Anchorage (0.30 D1 FR PPG)
0.23 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Ali Thomas
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.34 PPG
→ Notre Dame (0.18 D1 FR PPG)
0.19 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Eli Lichtenwald
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.36 PPG
→ Union (0.68 D1 FR PPG)
0.21 Strong
NCAAe PPG
Clint Carlisle
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.78 PPG
→ Army (0.52 D1 FR PPG)
0.27 Average
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Tyler Cann
Elmira · 2004-05
0.786 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Alex Sanchez
Aurora · 2015-16
0.000 No data
actual D2/3 PPG
Noah Trathen
UMass Dartmouth · 2023-24
0.000 No data
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.