| Season | Team | League | GP | G | A | Pts | PPG | NCAAe-PPG | Age-Adj | D3e-PPG | Age-Adj |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2009-10 | — | BCHL | 32 | 3 | 10 | 13 | 0.406 | 0.1565 | 0.1672 | 0.5911 | 0.6316 |
| 2010-11 | Powell River Kings | BCHL | 42 | 10 | 13 | 23 | 0.548 | 0.2110 | 0.2156 | 0.7969 | 0.8141 |
| 2011-12 | Powell River Kings | BCHL | 57 | 22 | 23 | 45 | 0.789 | 0.3042 | 0.2941 | 1.1490 | 1.1107 |
| 2012-13 | Powell River Kings | BCHL | 38 | 4 | 15 | 19 | 0.500 | 0.1926 | 0.1771 | 0.7277 | 0.6690 |
| Season | School | Div | Conference | Year | GP | G | A | Pts | PPG |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2016-17 | Manhattanville | D3 | UCHC | SR | 25 | 7 | 6 | 13 | 0.520 |
| 2015-16 | Manhattanville | D3 | UCHC | JR | 26 | 5 | 12 | 17 | 0.654 |
| 2014-15 | Manhattanville | D3 | UCHC | SO | 25 | 10 | 6 | 16 | 0.640 |
| 2013-14 | Manhattanville | D3 | UCHC | FR | 27 | 4 | 7 | 11 | 0.407 |
How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.
Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.