← New Search ↗ Social Card

Tyson Kirkby Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 1997-04-10 Country: Canada
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2013-14 Kemptville 73's CCHL 1 0 0 0 0.000
2014-15 Kemptville 73's CCHL 56 12 10 22 0.393 0.0852 0.0908 0.3040 0.3239
2015-16 Kemptville 73's CCHL 59 10 11 21 0.356 0.0772 0.0785 0.2754 0.2801
2016-17 Kemptville 73's CCHL 62 15 30 45 0.726 0.1574 0.1518 0.5616 0.5418
2017-18 CCHL 52 15 35 50 0.962 0.2085 0.1904 0.7439 0.6793
Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2019-20 Oswego D1 SO 25 4 11 15 0.600
2019-20 SUNY Oswego D3 SUNYAC SO 25 4 11 15 0.600
2018-19 Oswego D1 FR 10 2 1 3 0.300
2018-19 SUNY Oswego D3 SUNYAC FR 10 2 1 3 0.300
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.15
before college
Actual FR PPG
0.30
2018-19 · Oswego
+100.3% vs. projection

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

35%
NCAA D1
20%
NCAA D2/D3
42%
Age-Out / Club
2%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#22832
Forward overall
#1037
Forward born in 1997
#451
in CCHL

D1 Comparables

USHL · 2012-13 · 0.34 PPG
→ Notre Dame (0.18 D1 FR PPG)
0.18 Developing
NCAAe PPG
QMJHL · 2012-13 · 0.52 PPG
→ Boston University
0.23 No data
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.50 PPG
→ Brown (0.10 D1 FR PPG)
0.27 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.36 PPG
→ Union (0.68 D1 FR PPG)
0.19 Strong
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.59 PPG
→ Minnesota State (0.22 D1 FR PPG)
0.31 Developing
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

SUNY Brockport · 2012-13
0.905 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Worcester State · 2016-17
0.750 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Gustavus Adolphus · 2017-18
0.412 Average
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.