← New Search ↗ Social Card

Tyson Kirkby Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 1997-04-10 Country: Canada
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2013-14 Kemptville 73's CCHL 1 0 0 0 0.000
2014-15 Kemptville 73's CCHL 56 12 10 22 0.393 0.1121 0.1194 0.3041 0.3240
2015-16 Kemptville 73's CCHL 59 10 11 21 0.356 0.1016 0.1033 0.2755 0.2802
2016-17 Kemptville 73's CCHL 62 15 30 45 0.726 0.2071 0.1998 0.5618 0.5420
2017-18 CCHL 52 15 35 50 0.962 0.2744 0.2506 0.7443 0.6796
Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2019-20 SUNY Oswego D3 SO 25 4 11 15 0.600
2018-19 SUNY Oswego D3 FR 10 2 1 3 0.300
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.20
before college
Actual FR PPG
0.30
2018-19 · SUNY Oswego
+52.2% vs. projection

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

15%
NCAA D1
28%
NCAA D2/D3
57%
Age-Out / Club
0%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#18527
Forward overall
#761
Forward born in 1997
#539
in CCHL

D1 Comparables

NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.65 PPG
→ Alaska Anchorage (0.30 D1 FR PPG)
0.23 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.34 PPG
→ Notre Dame (0.18 D1 FR PPG)
0.19 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.59 PPG
→ Minnesota State (0.22 D1 FR PPG)
0.34 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.50 PPG
→ Brown (0.10 D1 FR PPG)
0.29 Developing
NCAAe PPG
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.78 PPG
→ Army (0.52 D1 FR PPG)
0.27 Average
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

SUNY Brockport · 2012-13
0.905 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Worcester State · 2016-17
0.750 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Canton · 2023-24
0.933 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.