IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Grant Rinke Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 1998-04-16 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2017-18 Philadelphia Little Flyers EHL 31 8 9 17 0.548 0.1177 0.1174 — —
2018-19 Smiths Falls Bears CCHL 54 5 9 14 0.259 0.0740 0.0680 0.2007 0.1845
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2022-23 Salve Regina D3 CNE SR 0 0 0 0 0.000
2021-22 Salve Regina D3 CNE JR 7 0 2 2 0.286
2020-21 Salve Regina D3 CNE SO 0 0 0 0 0.000
2019-20 Salve Regina D3 CNE FR 18 0 0 0 0.000

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

0%
NCAA D1
38%
NCAA D2/D3
62%
Age-Out / Club
0%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#43033
Forward overall
#2032
Forward born in 1998

D1 Comparables

Bob Kinne
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.48 PPG
→ Bemidji State (0.12 D1 FR PPG)
0.17 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Ali Thomas
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.34 PPG
→ Notre Dame (0.18 D1 FR PPG)
0.19 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Eli Lichtenwald
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.36 PPG
→ Union (0.68 D1 FR PPG)
0.21 Strong
NCAAe PPG
Ian Miller
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.57 PPG
→ Lake Superior State (0.30 D1 FR PPG)
0.20 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Nick DeCenzo
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.43 PPG
→ Army (0.32 D1 FR PPG)
0.16 Developing
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Ben Mariano
SUNY Potsdam · 2014-15
0.143 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG
Ryan Cooper
St. Scholastica · 2013-14
0.261 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG
Mark Strzoda
SUNY Oswego · 2000-01
0.240 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.