IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Ryan Cooper Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Defense DOB: 1993-04-18 Country: Canada
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2011-12 — BCHL 4 0 0 0 0.000 — — — —
2012-13 Weyburn Red Wings SJHL 53 6 21 27 0.509 0.1305 0.1288 0.3840 0.3789
2013-14 Dauphin Kings MJHL 33 2 15 17 0.515 0.0992 0.0922 0.3249 0.3021
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2017-18 St. Scholastica D3 MIAC SR 26 0 4 4 0.154
2016-17 St. Scholastica D3 MIAC JR 19 0 1 1 0.053
2015-16 St. Scholastica D3 MIAC SO 24 1 3 4 0.167
2014-15 St. Scholastica D3 MIAC FR 23 1 5 6 0.261
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.10
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.26
2014-15 · St. Scholastica
+158.6% vs. projection

NCAAe Rankings

#8352
Defenseman overall
#1093
Defenseman born in 1993

D1 Comparables

Marc-Antoine Carrier
QMJHL · 2012-13 · 0.37 PPG
→ Brown (0.04 D1 FR PPG)
0.16 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
Brandon Carlson
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.24 PPG
→ Alabama-Huntsville (0.11 D1 FR PPG)
0.13 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
Dominic Racobaldo
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.33 PPG
→ American International (0.12 D1 FR PPG)
0.18 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
Carter Foguth
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.08 PPG
→ Minnesota State (0.06 D1 FR PPG)
0.04 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
Michael Holland
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.18 PPG
→ RIT (0.05 D1 FR PPG)
0.09 Developing D
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Clayton Chessa
Concordia · 2011-12
0.000 No data
actual D2/3 PPG
Jake Heisinger
Curry · 2012-13
0.312 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG
Laurent Trépanier
Hobart · 2024-25
0.304 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.