IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Clayton Chessa Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 1991-04-22 Country: Canada
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2008-09 Cowichan Valley Capitals BCHL 3 1 1 2 0.667 0.2595 0.2786 0.9722 1.0439
2009-10 — BCHL 47 4 13 17 0.362 0.1408 0.1435 0.5275 0.5376
2010-11 — BCHL 42 8 13 21 0.500 0.1946 0.1892 0.7291 0.7089
2011-12 — BCHL 49 18 19 37 0.755 0.2939 0.2696 1.1012 1.0102
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2012-13 Concordia D3 MIAC — 2 0 0 0 0.000
2012-13 Concordia Wisconsin D3 — FR 2 0 0 0 0.000

NCAAe Rankings

#16943
Forward overall
#673
Forward born in 1991
#1475
in BCHL

D1 Comparables

Bradley Duwe
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.65 PPG
→ Alaska Anchorage (0.30 D1 FR PPG)
0.23 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Davey Middleton
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.50 PPG
→ Brown (0.10 D1 FR PPG)
0.29 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Clint Carlisle
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.78 PPG
→ Army (0.52 D1 FR PPG)
0.27 Average
NCAAe PPG
Jordan Nelson
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.59 PPG
→ Minnesota State (0.22 D1 FR PPG)
0.34 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Justin Parizek
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.93 PPG
→ Nebraska Omaha (0.22 D1 FR PPG)
0.32 Developing
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Carter Davis
St. Scholastica · 2007-08
0.538 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Justin Meers
Trine · 2018-19
0.643 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Mike Domsodi
Wentworth · 2010-11
1.250 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.