| Season | Team | League | GP | G | A | Pts | PPG | NCAAe-PPG | Age-Adj | D3e-PPG | Age-Adj |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2008-09 | Cowichan Valley Capitals | BCHL | 3 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 0.667 | 0.2569 | 0.2759 | 0.9702 | 1.0418 |
| 2009-10 | — | BCHL | 47 | 4 | 13 | 17 | 0.362 | 0.1394 | 0.1421 | 0.5264 | 0.5365 |
| 2010-11 | — | BCHL | 42 | 8 | 13 | 21 | 0.500 | 0.1926 | 0.1873 | 0.7277 | 0.7076 |
| 2011-12 | — | BCHL | 49 | 18 | 19 | 37 | 0.755 | 0.2909 | 0.2669 | 1.0989 | 1.0081 |
| Season | School | Div | Conference | Year | GP | G | A | Pts | PPG |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2012-13 | Concordia | D3 | MIAC | — | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.000 |
| 2012-13 | Concordia (WI) | D3 | NCHA | FR | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.000 |
How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.
Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.