IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Jake Heisinger Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 1992-04-28 Country: Canada
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2008-09 Winnipeg Blues MJHL 4 0 0 0 0.000 — — — —
2009-10 Winnipeg Blues MJHL 1 0 0 0 0.000 — — — —
2010-11 Winnipeg Blues MJHL 58 12 25 37 0.638 0.1805 0.1863 0.4019 0.4148
2011-12 Winnipeg Blues MJHL 61 20 34 54 0.885 0.2504 0.2458 0.5578 0.5476
2012-13 Winnipeg Blues MJHL 60 19 39 58 0.967 0.2735 0.2549 0.6091 0.5677
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2016-17 Curry D3 CNE SR 26 5 20 25 0.962
2015-16 Curry D3 CNE JR 25 3 15 18 0.720
2014-15 Curry D3 CNE SO 27 6 15 21 0.778
2013-14 Curry D3 CNE FR 16 0 5 5 0.312
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.22
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.31
2013-14 · Curry
+45.3% vs. projection

NCAAe Rankings

#15124
Forward overall
#654
Forward born in 1992
#288
in MJHL

D1 Comparables

Bradley Duwe
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.65 PPG
→ Alaska Anchorage (0.30 D1 FR PPG)
0.23 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Davey Middleton
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.50 PPG
→ Brown (0.10 D1 FR PPG)
0.29 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Clint Carlisle
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.78 PPG
→ Army (0.52 D1 FR PPG)
0.27 Average
NCAAe PPG
Jordan Nelson
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.59 PPG
→ Minnesota State (0.22 D1 FR PPG)
0.34 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Bob Kinne
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.48 PPG
→ Bemidji State (0.12 D1 FR PPG)
0.17 Developing
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Trevor McKinney
Buffalo State · 2008-09
0.400 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Connor Woolley
Salem State · 2018-19
0.583 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Sebastian Panetta
SUNY Geneseo · 2005-06
0.615 Average
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.