← New Search ↗ Social Card

Jake Heisinger Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 1992-04-28 Country: Canada
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2008-09 Winnipeg Blues MJHL 4 0 0 0 0.000
2009-10 Winnipeg Blues MJHL 1 0 0 0 0.000
2010-11 Winnipeg Blues MJHL 58 12 25 37 0.638 0.1228 0.1267 0.4023 0.4152
2011-12 Winnipeg Blues MJHL 61 20 34 54 0.885 0.1704 0.1673 0.5582 0.5480
2012-13 Winnipeg Blues MJHL 60 19 39 58 0.967 0.1861 0.1735 0.6096 0.5682
Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2016-17 Curry D3 CNE SR 26 5 20 25 0.962
2015-16 Curry D3 CNE JR 25 3 15 18 0.720
2014-15 Curry D3 CNE SO 27 6 15 21 0.778
2013-14 Curry D3 CNE FR 16 0 5 5 0.312
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.15
before college
Actual FR PPG
0.31
2013-14 · Curry
+113.5% vs. projection

NCAAe Rankings

#23290
Forward overall
#857
Forward born in 1992
#245
in MJHL

D1 Comparables

USHL · 2012-13 · 0.36 PPG
→ Union (0.68 D1 FR PPG)
0.19 Strong
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.34 PPG
→ Notre Dame (0.18 D1 FR PPG)
0.18 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.50 PPG
→ Brown (0.10 D1 FR PPG)
0.27 Developing
NCAAe PPG
QMJHL · 2012-13 · 0.52 PPG
→ Boston University
0.23 No data
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.59 PPG
→ Minnesota State (0.22 D1 FR PPG)
0.31 Developing
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Curry · 2023-24
0.808 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Connecticut College · 2024-25
0.522 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Salem State · 2018-19
0.583 Average
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.