IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Scott Elkow Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 1988-10-19 Country: Canada
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2005-06 Spruce Grove Saints AJHL 3 0 0 0 0.000 — — — —
2006-07 Fort Saskatchewan Traders AJHL 48 9 9 18 0.375 0.1253 0.1313 0.3481 0.3648
2007-08 St. Albert Steel AJHL 21 2 7 9 0.429 0.1432 0.1422 0.3979 0.3950
2008-09 St. Albert Steel AJHL 53 20 19 39 0.736 0.2458 0.2338 0.6830 0.6496
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2012-13 Neumann D3 MAC SR 18 2 4 6 0.333
2011-12 Neumann D3 MAC JR 1 0 0 0 0.000
2010-11 Neumann D3 MAC SO 9 0 1 1 0.111
2009-10 Neumann D3 — FR 6 1 1 2 0.333
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.17
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.33
2009-10 · Neumann
+97.5% vs. projection

NCAAe Rankings

#22076
Forward overall
#921
Forward born in 1988
#1167
in AJHL

D1 Comparables

Ryan Doucet
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.73 PPG
→ Air Force (0.10 D1 FR PPG)
0.26 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Ian Miller
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.57 PPG
→ Lake Superior State (0.30 D1 FR PPG)
0.20 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Tyler Deresky
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.79 PPG
→ Bentley (0.19 D1 FR PPG)
0.28 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Emil Romig
NAHL · 2012-13 · 1.00 PPG
→ Denver (0.31 D1 FR PPG)
0.35 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Woody Hudson
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.43 PPG
→ St. Lawrence (0.30 D1 FR PPG)
0.25 Developing
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Dan Law
Manhattanville · 2001-02
0.731 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Collin Kerchoff
Concordia Wisconsin · 2021-22
0.600 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Zeke Costello
Nichols · 2005-06
1.231 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.