IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Cameron Johnson Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 2004-11-28 Country: Canada
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2019-20 Austin USHS-MN 25 0 3 3 0.120 0.0323 0.0323 0.0291 0.0291
2020-21 Chilliwack Chiefs BCHL 20 3 8 11 0.550 0.2049 0.2049 0.8014 0.8014
2021-22 Chilliwack Chiefs BCHL 54 25 40 65 1.204 0.4484 0.4933 1.7539 1.9297
2022-23 Chicago Steel USHL 62 6 19 25 0.403 0.2478 0.2550 1.1879 1.2223
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2025-26 Harvard D1 ECAC JR 3 0 0 0 0.000
2024-25 Harvard D1 ECAC SO 31 5 4 9 0.290
2023-24 Harvard D1 ECAC FR 32 4 12 16 0.500
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.30
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.50
2023-24 · Harvard
+66.7% vs. projection

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

62%
NCAA D1
0%
NCAA D2/D3
22%
Age-Out / Club
15%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#15488
Forward overall
#753
Forward born in 2004

D1 Comparables

Jake Horton
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.43 PPG
→ Harvard (0.24 D1 FR PPG)
0.27 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Matt Gaudreau
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.33 PPG
→ Boston College (0.12 D1 FR PPG)
0.21 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Mitch Hults
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.46 PPG
→ Lake Superior State (0.50 D1 FR PPG)
0.29 Average
NCAAe PPG
Jake Jackson
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.50 PPG
→ Michigan Tech (0.09 D1 FR PPG)
0.32 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Drew Melanson
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.48 PPG
→ RPI (0.56 D1 FR PPG)
0.30 Strong
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Brett Ouderkirk
Norwich · 2015-16
0.966 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Anthony Iacullo
Saint Anselm · 2015-16
0.655 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Sam Ciappa
St. John Fisher · 2023-24
0.913 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.