← New Search ↗ Social Card

Evan Murr Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Defense DOB: 2003-02-27 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2019-20 Stillwater USHS-MN 27 9 19 28 1.037 0.2792 0.2792 0.2519 0.2519
2020-21 St. Cloud Norsemen NAHL 10 2 3 5 0.500 0.1981 0.1981 0.5250 0.5250
2021-22 St. Cloud Norsemen NAHL 56 13 30 43 0.768 0.3042 0.3146 0.8062 0.8337
2022-23 Sioux Falls Stampede USHL 62 4 19 23 0.371 0.2281 0.2147 1.0930 1.0289
Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2025-26 Minnesota D1 BigTen 40 10 20 30 0.750
2025-26 Minnesota State D1 CCHA JR 40 10 20 30 0.750
2024-25 Minnesota D1 BigTen JR 39 7 20 27 0.692
2023-24 Minnesota D1 BigTen SO 37 6 20 26 0.703
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.24
before college
Actual FR PPG
0.70
2023-24 · Minnesota
+192.3% vs. projection

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

60%
NCAA D1
5%
NCAA D2/D3
20%
Age-Out / Club
12%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#4527
Defenseman overall
#1144
Defenseman born in 2003

D1 Comparables

USHL · 2012-13 · 0.31 PPG
→ Harvard (0.12 D1 FR PPG)
0.18 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.29 PPG
→ Niagara (0.51 D1 FR PPG)
0.17 Elite D
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.48 PPG
→ Western Michigan (0.17 D1 FR PPG)
0.27 Average D
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.37 PPG
→ Ohio State (0.18 D1 FR PPG)
0.21 Average D
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.52 PPG
→ Harvard (0.67 D1 FR PPG)
0.30 Elite D
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Saint Anselm · 2001-02
1.375 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
Lebanon Valley · 2018-19
0.571 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
SUNY Oswego · 2018-19
0.880 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.