IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Gustav Stjernberg Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Defense DOB: 2002-10-12 Country: Sweden
Signed Professionally
SHL

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2019-20 — SuperElit 1 0 0 0 0.000 — — — —
2020-21 — SuperElit 18 2 3 5 0.278 0.1088 0.1088 0.3412 0.3412
2021-22 — SuperElit 47 10 19 29 0.617 0.2417 0.2333 0.7579 0.7317
2022-23 — USHL 62 8 12 20 0.323 0.1983 0.1829 0.9504 0.8767
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2025-26 Bowling Green D1 CCHA JR 25 6 4 10 0.400
2024-25 Bowling Green D1 CCHA SR 30 4 12 16 0.533
2023-24 Bowling Green D1 CCHA JR 31 4 7 11 0.355
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.19
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.35
2023-24 · Bowling Green
+85.1% vs. projection

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

62%
NCAA D1
12%
NCAA D2/D3
25%
Age-Out / Club
0%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

D1 Comparables

Nolan Valleau
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.41 PPG
→ Bowling Green
0.23 No data
NCAAe PPG
Patrick Koudys
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.23 PPG
→ RPI (0.10 D1 FR PPG)
0.13 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
Brandon Kirk
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.32 PPG
→ Dartmouth
0.18 No data
NCAAe PPG
Benjamin Gallacher
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.45 PPG
→ Ohio State (0.50 D1 FR PPG)
0.25 Elite D
NCAAe PPG
Taki Pantziris
OHL · 2012-13 · 0.29 PPG
→ Brown
0.15 No data
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Mike Collins
Elmira · 2011-12
1.000 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
Joe Hall
SUNY Oswego · 2006-07
0.560 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Matt Boyd
St. Norbert · 2005-06
1.033 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.