IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

David Milne Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 1989-11-21 Country: Canada
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2007-08 — OJHL 34 4 5 9 0.265 0.0649 0.0672 0.1822 0.1887
2008-09 Grande Prairie Storm AJHL 19 0 2 2 0.105 0.0353 0.0355 0.0974 0.0979
2009-10 — OJHL 42 6 16 22 0.524 0.1284 0.1196 0.3605 0.3359
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2011-12 Lake Forest D3 NCHA — 13 1 3 4 0.308
2010-11 Lake Forest D3 NCHA — 17 1 2 3 0.176
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.07
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.18
2010-11 · Lake Forest
+139.8% vs. projection

NCAAe Rankings

#41275
Forward overall
#1357
Forward born in 1989
#2719
in OJHL

D1 Comparables

Cullen Hurley
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.38 PPG
→ Wisconsin
0.21 No data
NCAAe PPG
Max Birkinbine
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.46 PPG
→ Air Force (0.14 D1 FR PPG)
0.25 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Tayler Munson
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.31 PPG
→ Alaska Fairbanks (0.35 D1 FR PPG)
0.17 Average
NCAAe PPG
Alexander Dahl
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.38 PPG
→ St. Lawrence (0.30 D1 FR PPG)
0.21 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Stanislav Dzakhov
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.27 PPG
→ Niagara (0.44 D1 FR PPG)
0.15 Average
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Stefan Seel
Concordia · 2014-15
0.769 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Xavier Tremblay
Westfield State · 2024-25
0.393 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Colin Murray
Castleton · 2009-10
0.750 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.