IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Colin Murray Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 1989-11-06 Country: Canada
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2007-08 Orangeville Crushers OJHL 4 1 1 2 0.500 0.1397 0.1444 0.3451 0.3566
2008-09 Cobourg Cougars OJHL 14 1 2 3 0.214 0.0599 0.0588 0.1479 0.1452
2009-10 — OJHL 49 11 11 22 0.449 0.1255 0.1167 0.3099 0.2881
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2013-14 Castleton D3 LittleEast SR 26 7 17 24 0.923
2012-13 Castleton D3 LittleEast JR 19 3 5 8 0.421
2011-12 Castleton D3 LittleEast SO 20 12 11 23 1.150
2010-11 Castleton D3 LittleEast FR 20 8 7 15 0.750
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.08
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.75
2010-11 · Castleton
+836.3% vs. projection

NCAAe Rankings

#38528
Forward overall
#1433
Forward born in 1989
#3746
in OJHL

D1 Comparables

Ian Miller
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.57 PPG
→ Lake Superior State (0.30 D1 FR PPG)
0.20 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Nick DeCenzo
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.43 PPG
→ Army (0.32 D1 FR PPG)
0.16 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Ryan Doucet
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.73 PPG
→ Air Force (0.10 D1 FR PPG)
0.26 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Cullen Hurley
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.38 PPG
→ Wisconsin
0.23 No data
NCAAe PPG
Evan Ritt
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.67 PPG
→ Denver
0.24 No data
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Ryan Olson
Finlandia · 2003-04
0.625 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Bryan Zurowski
SUNY Geneseo · 2018-19
0.267 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG
Brandon Bissett
Hamline · 2017-18
0.360 Average
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.