IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Bryan Zurowski Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 1998-11-20 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2017-18 Buffalo Jr. Sabres OJHL 43 10 14 24 0.558 0.1368 0.1354 0.3843 0.3804
2018-19 King Rebellion OJHL 52 25 31 56 1.077 0.2639 0.2483 0.7414 0.6977
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2022-23 SUNY Geneseo D3 SUNYAC SR 25 2 7 9 0.360
2021-22 SUNY Geneseo D3 SUNYAC JR 27 4 10 14 0.518
2019-20 Geneseo D1 — FR 15 2 2 4 0.267
2019-20 SUNY Geneseo D3 SUNYAC FR 15 2 2 4 0.267
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.17
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.27
2019-20 · Geneseo
+53.4% vs. projection

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

50%
NCAA D1
5%
NCAA D2/D3
45%
Age-Out / Club
0%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#20402
Forward overall
#981
Forward born in 1998
#798
in OJHL

D1 Comparables

Tyler Deresky
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.79 PPG
→ Bentley (0.19 D1 FR PPG)
0.28 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Max Birkinbine
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.46 PPG
→ Air Force (0.14 D1 FR PPG)
0.25 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Cullen Hurley
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.38 PPG
→ Wisconsin
0.21 No data
NCAAe PPG
Joseph-Matthew Manno
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.63 PPG
→ Northeastern (0.22 D1 FR PPG)
0.34 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Emil Romig
NAHL · 2012-13 · 1.00 PPG
→ Denver (0.31 D1 FR PPG)
0.35 Developing
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Brian Hennessey
SUNY Oswego · 2012-13
0.000 No data
actual D2/3 PPG
Tory Allan
Norwich · 2008-09
0.722 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Brett Bestwick
SUNY Geneseo · 2002-03
0.762 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.