← New Search ↗ Social Card

Owen Keefe Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Defense DOB: 2006-03-26 Country: USA
⚠️ Aging Out 2026-27: Turns 20 before Dec 31, 2026 — final eligible junior season.
Northeastern
HockeyEast D1

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2022-23 Muskegon Lumberjacks USHL 59 4 9 13 0.220 0.1300 0.1424 0.6616 0.7245
2023-24 Muskegon Lumberjacks USHL 60 3 10 13 0.217 0.1278 0.1336 0.6508 0.6804
2024-25 Sioux City Musketeers USHL 57 1 9 10 0.175 0.1035 0.1029 0.5268 0.5239
2025-26 Drummondville Voltigeurs QMJHL 63 8 26 34 0.540 0.2652 0.2524 1.4412 1.3714
Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

32%
NCAA D1
5%
NCAA D2/D3
25%
Age-Out / Club
38%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#7797
Defenseman overall
#1632
Defenseman born in 2006

D1 Comparables

OHL · 2012-13 · 0.55 PPG
→ Cornell (0.20 D1 FR PPG)
0.30 Average D
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.37 PPG
→ Ohio State (0.18 D1 FR PPG)
0.20 Average D
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.47 PPG
→ Merrimack (0.14 D1 FR PPG)
0.26 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.52 PPG
→ Harvard (0.67 D1 FR PPG)
0.29 Elite D
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.48 PPG
→ Western Michigan (0.17 D1 FR PPG)
0.26 Average D
NCAAe PPG

Northeastern Alumni similar profiles who attended this school

USHL 2013-14
0.41
actual FR PPG at Northeastern
BCHL 2019-20
0.08
actual FR PPG at Northeastern
NAHL 2021-22
0.00
actual FR PPG at Northeastern
USHL 2023-24
0.03
actual FR PPG at Northeastern

D2/3 Comparables

Wisconsin-Stevens Point · 2023-24
0.800 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Becker · 2006-07
1.000 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
Wentworth · 2006-07
1.407 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.