IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Alex Kromm Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 1991-10-31 Country: Canada
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2009-10 Calgary Royals AJHL 55 13 22 35 0.636 0.2112 0.2221 0.5898 0.6202
2010-11 — AJHL 58 12 26 38 0.655 0.2174 0.2172 0.6072 0.6066
2011-12 Okotoks Oilers AJHL 49 16 23 39 0.796 0.2641 0.2504 0.7376 0.6994
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2015-16 Wisconsin-Stevens Point D3 BigTen SR 31 6 8 14 0.452
2014-15 Wisconsin-Stevens Point D3 BigTen JR 30 5 5 10 0.333
2013-14 Wisconsin-Stevens Point D3 BigTen SO 27 5 7 12 0.444
2012-13 Wisconsin-Stevens Point D3 — FR 26 4 9 13 0.500
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.20
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.50
2012-13 · Wisconsin-Stevens Point
+146.3% vs. projection

NCAAe Rankings

#22799
Forward overall
#807
Forward born in 1991
#735
in AJHL

D1 Comparables

Max Birkinbine
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.46 PPG
→ Air Force (0.14 D1 FR PPG)
0.26 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Cullen Hurley
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.38 PPG
→ Wisconsin
0.22 No data
NCAAe PPG
Joseph-Matthew Manno
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.63 PPG
→ Northeastern (0.22 D1 FR PPG)
0.36 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Woody Hudson
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.43 PPG
→ St. Lawrence (0.30 D1 FR PPG)
0.24 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Jonathan Davis
NAHL · 2012-13 · 1.03 PPG
→ Nebraska Omaha (0.06 D1 FR PPG)
0.39 Developing
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Brian Hennessey
SUNY Oswego · 2012-13
0.000 No data
actual D2/3 PPG
Brett Bestwick
SUNY Geneseo · 2002-03
0.762 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Ryan Frost
Castleton · 2010-11
0.750 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.