← New Search ↗ Social Card

Gavin Cornforth Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 2006-12-15 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2021-22 Thayer Academy NE-Prep 20 4 4 8 0.400 0.1128 0.1128 0.1830 0.1830
2022-23 Dubuque Fighting Saints USHL 49 4 6 10 0.204 0.1255 0.1420 0.6013 0.6802
2023-24 Dubuque Fighting Saints USHL 62 15 17 32 0.516 0.3172 0.3431 1.5205 1.6446
2024-25 Dubuque Fighting Saints USHL 62 27 27 54 0.871 0.5354 0.5518 2.5661 2.6446
2025-26 Moncton Wildcats QMJHL 29 12 18 30 1.034 0.5144 0.5081 2.7590 2.7252
Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2025-26 Boston College D1 HockeyEast SR 18 0 3 3 0.167
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.40
before college
Actual FR PPG
0.17
2025-26 · Boston College
-58.4% vs. projection

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

20%
NCAA D1
0%
NCAA D2/D3
20%
Age-Out / Club
60%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#6070
Forward overall
#152
Forward born in 2006

D1 Comparables

USHL · 2012-13 · 0.86 PPG
→ Minnesota Duluth (0.61 D1 FR PPG)
0.52 Strong
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.82 PPG
→ Minnesota (0.33 D1 FR PPG)
0.50 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.79 PPG
→ North Dakota (0.16 D1 FR PPG)
0.48 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.75 PPG
→ UMass Lowell (0.24 D1 FR PPG)
0.45 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.75 PPG
→ Boston University (0.77 D1 FR PPG)
0.45 Strong
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Elmira · 2017-18
1.067 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
New England · 2017-18
1.667 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
Buffalo State · 2023-24
1.120 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.