← New Search ↗ Social Card

Marcus Broberg Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Defense DOB: 2003-10-23 Country: Sweden
Signed Professionally
Malmö Redhawks · SHL

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2020-21 AIK U20 SuperElit 10 0 2 2 0.200 0.0789 0.0789 0.2457 0.2457
2021-22 SuperElit 48 1 18 19 0.396 0.1562 0.1588 0.4862 0.4944
2022-23 USHL 30 3 7 10 0.333 0.1966 0.1915 0.9820 0.9565
2023-24 Salmon Arm Silverbacks BCHL 49 4 21 25 0.510 0.1966 0.1868 0.7434 0.7065
Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2025-26 Nebraska Omaha D1 NCHC SO 36 1 5 6 0.167
2024-25 Nebraska Omaha D1 NCHC 27 1 8 9 0.333
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.18
before college
Actual FR PPG
0.33
2024-25 · Nebraska Omaha
+87.1% vs. projection

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

42%
NCAA D1
12%
NCAA D2/D3
42%
Age-Out / Club
2%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#6524
Defenseman overall
#1591
Defenseman born in 2003

D1 Comparables

USHL · 2012-13 · 0.41 PPG
→ Bowling Green
0.22 No data
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.32 PPG
→ Dartmouth
0.17 No data
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.23 PPG
→ RPI (0.10 D1 FR PPG)
0.13 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.45 PPG
→ Ohio State (0.50 D1 FR PPG)
0.24 Elite D
NCAAe PPG
OHL · 2012-13 · 0.29 PPG
→ Brown
0.15 No data
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Castleton · 2010-11
0.750 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
SUNY Oswego · 2012-13
0.000 No data
actual D2/3 PPG
SUNY Geneseo · 2005-06
0.550 Average
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.