← New Search ↗ Social Card

Sam Laurila Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Defense DOB: 2006-09-02 Country: USA
2025 · Round 5, Pick #138  ·  New York Islanders New York Islanders
⚠️ Aging Out 2026-27: Turns 20 before Dec 31, 2026 — final eligible junior season.
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2022-23 NTDP-U18 54 4 11 15 0.278 0.2065 0.2152 1.0366 1.0803
2023-24 NTDP-U18 61 3 8 11 0.180 0.1340 0.1328 0.6728 0.6666
2024-25 Fargo Force USHL 57 8 33 41 0.719 0.4243 0.4312 2.1603 2.1956
Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2025-26 North Dakota D1 NCHC FR 36 1 9 10 0.278
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.29
before college
Actual FR PPG
0.28
2025-26 · North Dakota
-5.6% vs. projection

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

92%
NCAA D1
2%
NCAA D2/D3
5%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#4182
Defenseman overall
#873
Defenseman born in 2006

D1 Comparables

USHL · 2012-13 · 0.49 PPG
→ UMass Lowell (0.41 D1 FR PPG)
0.29 Strong D
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.49 PPG
→ Maine (0.32 D1 FR PPG)
0.29 Strong D
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.53 PPG
→ Nebraska Omaha (0.64 D1 FR PPG)
0.32 Elite D
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.55 PPG
→ St. Lawrence (0.95 D1 FR PPG)
0.32 Elite D
NCAAe PPG
NTDP-U18 · 2012-13 · 0.55 PPG
→ Denver (0.42 D1 FR PPG)
0.39 Strong D
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Plymouth State · 2012-13
1.444 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
Buffalo State · 2022-23
1.120 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
Utica · 2017-18
1.448 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.