IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

David Norris Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 1993-03-03 Country: Canada
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2011-12 Calgary Mustangs AJHL 52 10 15 25 0.481 0.1613 0.1637 0.4449 0.4516
2012-13 Calgary Mustangs AJHL 54 13 28 41 0.759 0.2547 0.2455 0.7027 0.6773
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2017-18 Arizona State D1 NCHC SR 30 5 11 16 0.533
2016-17 Arizona State D1 NCHC JR 22 3 9 12 0.545
2014-15 American International D1 AHA SO 15 4 10 14 0.933
2013-14 American International D1 AHA FR 35 7 26 33 0.943
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.18
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.94
2013-14 · American International
+417.8% vs. projection

NCAAe Rankings

#26426
Forward overall
#910
Forward born in 1993
#761
in AJHL

D1 Comparables

Alexander Dahl
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.38 PPG
→ St. Lawrence (0.30 D1 FR PPG)
0.21 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Eric Freschi
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.51 PPG
→ Cornell (0.10 D1 FR PPG)
0.28 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Gage Hough
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.39 PPG
→ UMass Lowell (0.12 D1 FR PPG)
0.22 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Evan Janssen
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.45 PPG
→ Denver (0.14 D1 FR PPG)
0.25 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Ryan Siiro
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.52 PPG
→ Princeton (0.38 D1 FR PPG)
0.29 Average
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Kailin Chen
UMass Dartmouth · 2023-24
1.454 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
Louie Kamienski
Endicott · 2023-24
1.000 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
Colin MacCormack
Bowdoin · 2004-05
0.840 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.