← New Search ↗ Social Card

Riley Fitzgerald Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 2003-06-02 Country: USA
Colby
Verbal NESCAC D3

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2021-22 Boston Jr. Bruins NCDC 5 1 1 2 0.400 0.1631 0.1702 0.3215 0.3355
2022-23 Cedar Rapids RoughRiders USHL 50 3 5 8 0.160 0.0944 0.0901 0.4805 0.4586
2023-24 New Jersey Jr. Titans NAHL 7 3 4 7 1.000 0.3674 0.3491 0.7509 0.6794
Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2025-26 Mercyhurst D1 AHA SO 20 4 2 6 0.300
2024-25 Mercyhurst D1 AHA 33 7 7 14 0.424
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.21
before college
Actual FR PPG
0.42
2024-25 · Mercyhurst
+101.9% vs. projection

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

50%
NCAA D1
5%
NCAA D2/D3
22%
Age-Out / Club
22%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#47212
Forward overall
#3115
Forward born in 2003

D1 Comparables

NAHL · 2012-13 · 1.06 PPG
→ Niagara (0.58 D1 FR PPG)
0.36 Strong
NCAAe PPG
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.93 PPG
→ Nebraska Omaha (0.22 D1 FR PPG)
0.32 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.50 PPG
→ Brown (0.10 D1 FR PPG)
0.27 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.59 PPG
→ Minnesota State (0.22 D1 FR PPG)
0.31 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.80 PPG
→ RIT (0.65 D1 FR PPG)
0.43 Strong
NCAAe PPG

Colby Alumni similar profiles who attended this school

0.75
actual FR PPG at Colby
0.50
actual FR PPG at Colby
0.73
actual FR PPG at Colby
0.00
actual FR PPG at Colby

D2/3 Comparables

Worcester State · 2016-17
0.750 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Suffolk · 2014-15
0.565 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Lake Forest · 2021-22
0.000 No data
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.