IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Mark Logan Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 1995-04-14 Country: Canada
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2011-12 Brooks Bandits AJHL 1 0 0 0 0.000 — — — —
2012-13 Brooks Bandits AJHL 34 3 8 11 0.324 0.1085 0.1160 0.2994 0.3202
2013-14 Brooks Bandits AJHL 51 12 9 21 0.412 0.1381 0.1405 0.3811 0.3878
2014-15 Brooks Bandits AJHL 59 22 23 45 0.763 0.2558 0.2467 0.7058 0.6808
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2018-19 RIT D1 AHA SR 28 1 0 1 0.036
2017-18 RIT D1 AHA JR 37 3 6 9 0.243
2016-17 RIT D1 AHA SO 21 0 2 2 0.095
2015-16 RIT D1 AHA FR 28 3 4 7 0.250
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.17
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.25
2015-16 · RIT
+43.0% vs. projection

NCAAe Rankings

#31240
Forward overall
#1247
Forward born in 1995
#993
in AJHL

D1 Comparables

Evan Janssen
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.45 PPG
→ Denver (0.14 D1 FR PPG)
0.25 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Gage Hough
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.39 PPG
→ UMass Lowell (0.12 D1 FR PPG)
0.22 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Tommy Schutt
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.37 PPG
→ Quinnipiac (0.28 D1 FR PPG)
0.21 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Eric Freschi
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.51 PPG
→ Cornell (0.10 D1 FR PPG)
0.28 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Devin Loe
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.85 PPG
→ Miami (0.71 D1 FR PPG)
0.31 Strong
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Nick Kulas
Utica · 2005-06
0.783 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Anthony Piccininno
Alvernia · 2023-24
0.875 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Kyle Gattelaro
Wisconsin-River Falls · 2012-13
0.893 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.