IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Colton Jamieson Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Defense DOB: 2004-11-28 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2020-21 Cretin-Derham Hall USHS-MN 19 3 7 10 0.526 0.1417 0.1417 0.1278 0.1278
2021-22 Cretin-Derham Hall USHS-MN 27 1 13 14 0.518 0.1396 0.1396 0.1259 0.1259
2022-23 Madison Capitols USHL 14 1 6 7 0.500 0.3074 0.3163 1.4731 1.5158
2023-24 Madison Capitols USHL 55 5 8 13 0.236 0.1453 0.1423 0.6965 0.6821
2024-25 Madison Capitols USHL 61 10 29 39 0.639 0.3930 0.3648 1.8835 1.7485
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2025-26 St. Thomas D1 CCHA FR 18 1 1 2 0.111
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.26
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.11
2025-26 · St. Thomas
-57.3% vs. projection

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

78%
NCAA D1
0%
NCAA D2/D3
15%
Age-Out / Club
8%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#3181
Defenseman overall
#799
Defenseman born in 2004

D1 Comparables

Nolan Valleau
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.41 PPG
→ Bowling Green
0.23 No data
NCAAe PPG
Matt Van Voorhis
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.47 PPG
→ Denver (0.10 D1 FR PPG)
0.27 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
Barrett Kaib
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.57 PPG
→ Providence (0.19 D1 FR PPG)
0.33 Average D
NCAAe PPG
Paul LaDue
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.79 PPG
→ North Dakota (0.51 D1 FR PPG)
0.44 Elite D
NCAAe PPG
Victor Newell
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.52 PPG
→ Harvard (0.67 D1 FR PPG)
0.30 Elite D
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Brian Berger
Marian · 2010-11
1.038 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
Jason Yuel
Curry · 2005-06
1.769 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
Connor Powell
Elmira · 2015-16
1.080 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.