IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Alex Cromwell Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 1994-05-14 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2012-13 Fort McMurray Oil Barons AJHL 56 6 7 13 0.232 0.0778 0.0796 0.2148 0.2199
2013-14 Fort McMurray Oil Barons AJHL 60 8 17 25 0.417 0.1398 0.1359 0.3856 0.3747
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2017-18 Providence D1 HockeyEast SR 1 0 0 0 0.000
2016-17 Providence D1 HockeyEast JR 5 0 1 1 0.200
2015-16 Providence D1 HockeyEast SO 1 0 0 0 0.000
2014-15 Providence D1 HockeyEast — 0 0 0 0 0.000

NCAAe Rankings

#44164
Forward overall
#1790
Forward born in 1994
#1758
in AJHL

D1 Comparables

Matthew Hansen
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.25 PPG
→ Colorado College (0.17 D1 FR PPG)
0.14 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Tyler Spezia
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.26 PPG
→ Bowling Green (0.25 D1 FR PPG)
0.15 Developing
NCAAe PPG
William Messa
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.21 PPG
→ Northeastern
0.12 No data
NCAAe PPG
Matt Pohlkamp
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.33 PPG
→ Bowling Green (0.41 D1 FR PPG)
0.19 Average
NCAAe PPG
Ben Greiner
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.17 PPG
→ Bowling Green (0.38 D1 FR PPG)
0.10 Average
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Nikita Sobolev
New England College · 2023-24
0.000 No data
actual D2/3 PPG
Maxim Tsegelnik
Albertus Magnus · 2022-23
0.375 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Ethan Finlason
UMass Dartmouth · 2021-22
0.500 Average
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.