← New Search ↗ Social Card

Cayden Casey Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 2004-10-07 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2019-20 Elk River/Zimmerman USHS-MN 28 12 12 24 0.857 0.2307 0.2307 0.2082 0.2082
2020-21 Elk River/Zimmerman USHS-MN 20 17 13 30 1.500 0.4038 0.4038 0.3644 0.3644
2021-22 Andover USHS-MN 31 24 49 73 2.355 0.6339 0.6339 0.5720 0.5720
2022-23 Des Moines Buccaneers USHL 17 2 4 6 0.353 0.2169 0.2216 1.0397 1.0625
2023-24 Minot Minotauros NAHL 57 12 22 34 0.597 0.2363 0.2405 0.6263 0.6374
2024-25 Cedar Rapids RoughRiders USHL 21 5 1 6 0.286 0.1756 0.1618 0.8417 0.7754
Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2025-26 St. Lawrence D1 ECAC SO 35 4 20 24 0.686
2024-25 St. Lawrence D1 ECAC 13 1 3 4 0.308
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.20
before college
Actual FR PPG
0.31
2024-25 · St. Lawrence
+54.3% vs. projection

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

25%
NCAA D1
12%
NCAA D2/D3
55%
Age-Out / Club
0%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#27515
Forward overall
#1594
Forward born in 2004

D1 Comparables

USHL · 2012-13 · 0.43 PPG
→ St. Lawrence (0.30 D1 FR PPG)
0.24 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.38 PPG
→ Wisconsin
0.22 No data
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.46 PPG
→ Air Force (0.14 D1 FR PPG)
0.26 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.36 PPG
→ Union (0.68 D1 FR PPG)
0.20 Strong
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.38 PPG
→ St. Lawrence (0.30 D1 FR PPG)
0.22 Developing
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Bowdoin · 2002-03
0.714 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Lake Forest · 2017-18
0.500 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Elmira · 2015-16
1.000 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.