IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Tristan Thompson Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Defense DOB: 1997-01-02 Country: Canada
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2012-13 Drumheller Dragons AJHL 2 0 0 0 0.000 — — — —
2013-14 Drumheller Dragons AJHL 3 0 1 1 0.333 0.1118 0.1234 0.3084 0.3404
2014-15 Drumheller Dragons AJHL 55 9 7 16 0.291 0.0976 0.1025 0.2691 0.2827
2015-16 — AJHL 56 11 36 47 0.839 0.2815 0.2827 0.7765 0.7798
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2019-20 Alaska Fairbanks D1 WCHA — 35 5 9 14 0.400
2018-19 Alaska Fairbanks D1 WCHA — 35 6 14 20 0.571
2017-18 Alaska Fairbanks D1 WCHA — 35 5 6 11 0.314
2016-17 Alaska Fairbanks D1 WCHA — 31 2 4 6 0.194
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.20
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.19
2016-17 · Alaska Fairbanks
-2.7% vs. projection

NCAAe Rankings

#6821
Defenseman overall
#1309
Defenseman born in 1997
#838
in AJHL

D1 Comparables

Nelson Armstrong
OHL · 2012-13 · 0.52 PPG
→ St. Lawrence (0.19 D1 FR PPG)
0.29 Average D
NCAAe PPG
Dakota Mermis
OHL · 2012-13 · 0.41 PPG
→ Denver (0.21 D1 FR PPG)
0.23 Average D
NCAAe PPG
Nolan Gluchowski
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.40 PPG
→ St. Lawrence (0.55 D1 FR PPG)
0.23 Elite D
NCAAe PPG
Matias Cleland
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.62 PPG
→ New Hampshire (0.10 D1 FR PPG)
0.36 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
Ryan Lowney
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.65 PPG
→ Ferris State (0.35 D1 FR PPG)
0.37 Strong D
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Dillon Henningson
Manhattanville · 2004-05
0.765 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Steve Gervais
Neumann · 2007-08
0.625 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Nick DeSousa
Neumann · 2009-10
1.000 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.