IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Brinson Pasichnuk Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Defense DOB: 1997-11-24 Country: Canada
Signed Professionally

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2013-14 Bonnyville Pontiacs AJHL 2 0 1 1 0.500 0.1677 0.1926 0.4627 0.5314
2014-15 Bonnyville Pontiacs AJHL 56 8 21 29 0.518 0.1737 0.1903 0.4793 0.5250
2015-16 Bonnyville Pontiacs AJHL 52 20 45 65 1.250 0.4192 0.4397 1.1567 1.2131
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2019-20 Arizona State D1 NCHC SR 36 11 26 37 1.028
2018-19 Arizona State D1 NCHC JR 35 13 17 30 0.857
2017-18 Arizona State D1 NCHC SO 34 8 18 26 0.765
2016-17 Arizona State D1 NCHC FR 31 7 7 14 0.452
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.32
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.45
2016-17 · Arizona State
+40.7% vs. projection

NCAAe Rankings

D1 Comparables

Will Butcher
NTDP-U18 · 2012-13 · 0.55 PPG
→ Denver (0.42 D1 FR PPG)
0.39 Strong D
NCAAe PPG
Michael Kapla
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.49 PPG
→ UMass Lowell (0.41 D1 FR PPG)
0.29 Strong D
NCAAe PPG
Matt Nuttle
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.67 PPG
→ Cornell
0.41 No data
NCAAe PPG
Jordan Gross
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.48 PPG
→ Notre Dame (0.67 D1 FR PPG)
0.30 Elite D
NCAAe PPG
Michael Brodzinski
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.54 PPG
→ Minnesota (0.50 D1 FR PPG)
0.34 Elite D
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Brett Ouderkirk
Norwich · 2015-16
0.966 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Dustin Norman
Wisconsin-River Falls · 2002-03
0.850 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Brendan Bottem
Marian · 2021-22
0.667 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.