← New Search ↗ Social Card

Nick Prkusic Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 1996-11-10 Country: Canada
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2013-14 Brooks Bandits AJHL 1 0 0 0 0.000
2014-15 Brooks Bandits AJHL 28 9 5 14 0.500 0.1677 0.1750 0.4627 0.4828
2015-16 Brooks Bandits AJHL 59 18 28 46 0.780 0.2615 0.2607 0.7215 0.7193
2016-17 Brooks Bandits AJHL 42 26 32 58 1.381 0.4632 0.4392 1.2780 1.2118
Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2020-21 Robert Morris D1 AHA SR 24 7 18 25 1.042
2019-20 Robert Morris D1 AHA JR 34 11 17 28 0.824
2018-19 Robert Morris D1 AHA SO 38 7 16 23 0.605
2017-18 Robert Morris D1 AHA FR 32 5 0 5 0.156
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.31
before college
Actual FR PPG
0.16
2017-18 · Robert Morris
-50.4% vs. projection

NCAAe Rankings

#13778
Forward overall
#551
Forward born in 1996
#209
in AJHL

D1 Comparables

NAHL · 2012-13 · 1.14 PPG
→ UConn (0.18 D1 FR PPG)
0.40 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.75 PPG
→ Ferris State (0.56 D1 FR PPG)
0.41 Strong
NCAAe PPG
NAHL · 2012-13 · 1.18 PPG
→ Air Force (0.26 D1 FR PPG)
0.41 Developing
NCAAe PPG
NAHL · 2012-13 · 1.27 PPG
→ Ferris State (0.19 D1 FR PPG)
0.44 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.63 PPG
→ Northeastern (0.22 D1 FR PPG)
0.34 Developing
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Misericordia · 2023-24
0.000 No data
actual D2/3 PPG
Adrian · 2018-19
1.000 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
SUNY Geneseo · 2001-02
1.083 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.