IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Charlie Michaud Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Defense DOB: 2006-08-12 Country: USA
⚠️ Aging Out 2026-27: Turns 20 before Dec 31, 2026 — final eligible junior season.
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2022-23 Madison Capitols USHL 6 0 2 2 0.333 0.1966 0.2190 1.0010 1.1153
2023-24 Madison Capitols USHL 55 4 12 16 0.291 0.1716 0.1827 0.8737 0.9301
2024-25 Madison Capitols USHL 61 5 27 32 0.525 0.3095 0.3137 1.5756 1.5968
2025-26 Penticton Vees WHL 35 0 15 15 0.429 0.2085 0.2007 1.0517 1.0123
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2025-26 Miami D1 NCHC FR 6 0 0 0 0.000

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

38%
NCAA D1
2%
NCAA D2/D3
45%
Age-Out / Club
15%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#5013
Defenseman overall
#1057
Defenseman born in 2006

D1 Comparables

Tommy Davis
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.34 PPG
→ Princeton (0.29 D1 FR PPG)
0.20 Average D
NCAAe PPG
Christian Neumann
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.29 PPG
→ UConn (0.10 D1 FR PPG)
0.16 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
Mike McKee
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.50 PPG
→ Western Michigan (0.05 D1 FR PPG)
0.28 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
Neal Goff
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.18 PPG
→ Western Michigan (0.14 D1 FR PPG)
0.10 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
Tucker Poolman
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.44 PPG
→ North Dakota (0.45 D1 FR PPG)
0.25 Strong D
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Jack Hatton
Saint Mary's (MN) · 2016-17
0.600 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Richard McCartney
SUNY Plattsburgh · 2015-16
0.923 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Dustin Norman
Wisconsin-River Falls · 2003-04
0.850 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.