← New Search ↗ Social Card

Dallas Comeau Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 1997-09-19 Country: Canada
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2015-16 Grande Prairie Storm AJHL 47 5 7 12 0.255 0.0856 0.0890 0.2362 0.2456
2016-17 Grande Prairie Storm AJHL 60 12 18 30 0.500 0.1677 0.1662 0.4626 0.4585
2017-18 Grande Prairie Storm AJHL 60 22 47 69 1.150 0.3857 0.3605 1.0640 0.9946
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2021-22 Vermont D1 HockeyEast — 21 1 2 3 0.143
2020-21 Vermont D1 HockeyEast JR 3 0 0 0 0.000
2019-20 Vermont D1 HockeyEast SO 23 1 3 4 0.174
2018-19 Vermont D1 HockeyEast FR 14 1 1 2 0.143
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.24
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.14
2018-19 · Vermont
-41.0% vs. projection

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

65%
NCAA D1
2%
NCAA D2/D3
32%
Age-Out / Club
0%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#22440
Forward overall
#1042
Forward born in 1997
#547
in AJHL

D1 Comparables

NAHL · 2012-13 · 1.00 PPG
→ Denver (0.31 D1 FR PPG)
0.35 Developing
NCAAe PPG
NAHL · 2012-13 · 1.03 PPG
→ Nebraska Omaha (0.06 D1 FR PPG)
0.36 Developing
NCAAe PPG
NAHL · 2012-13 · 1.14 PPG
→ UConn (0.18 D1 FR PPG)
0.40 Developing
NCAAe PPG
NAHL · 2012-13 · 1.18 PPG
→ Air Force (0.26 D1 FR PPG)
0.41 Developing
NCAAe PPG
NAHL · 2012-13 · 1.27 PPG
→ Ferris State (0.19 D1 FR PPG)
0.44 Developing
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Wentworth · 2023-24
0.824 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Saint Mary's (MN) · 2021-22
0.480 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Endicott · 2018-19
1.222 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.