← New Search ↗ Social Card

Drew Stewart Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 2005-11-03 Country: USA
Dartmouth
ECAC D1

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2021-22 Benilde-St. Margaret's USHS-MN 25 16 19 35 1.400 0.1772 0.1772 0.3401 0.3401
2022-23 Benilde-St. Margaret's USHS-MN 27 24 27 51 1.889 0.2391 0.2391 1.5017 1.6151
2023-24 Cedar Rapids RoughRiders USHL 53 7 15 22 0.415 0.2449 0.2512 1.2467 1.2790
2024-25 Muskegon Lumberjacks USHL 60 15 14 29 0.483 0.2851 0.2779 1.4515 1.4150
2025-26 Muskegon Lumberjacks USHL 56 30 31 61 1.089 0.6426 0.5954 3.2716 3.0313
Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

90%
NCAA D1
0%
NCAA D2/D3
2%
Age-Out / Club
8%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#7023
Forward overall
#242
Forward born in 2005

D1 Comparables

USHL · 2012-13 · 1.20 PPG
→ Western Michigan (0.19 D1 FR PPG)
0.65 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 1.21 PPG
→ Northeastern (1.05 D1 FR PPG)
0.65 Elite
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.89 PPG
→ Yale
0.48 No data
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.95 PPG
→ Union (0.89 D1 FR PPG)
0.53 Elite
NCAAe PPG
NAHL · 2012-13 · 1.33 PPG
→ UMass (0.13 D1 FR PPG)
0.46 Developing
NCAAe PPG

Dartmouth Alumni similar profiles who attended this school

BCHL 2023-24
0.66
actual FR PPG at Dartmouth
AJHL 2020-21
0.74
actual FR PPG at Dartmouth
NCDC 2017-18
0.39
actual FR PPG at Dartmouth
BCHL 2021-22
0.27
actual FR PPG at Dartmouth

D2/3 Comparables

Hamilton · 2001-02
1.400 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
Utica · 2018-19
1.448 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
SUNY Oswego · 2002-03
1.704 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.