← New Search ↗ Social Card

Dawson Bruneski Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Defense DOB: 1999-06-24 Country: Canada
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2015-16 Whitecourt Wolverines AJHL 32 4 1 5 0.156 0.0524 0.0591 0.1445 0.1630
2016-17 Whitecourt Wolverines AJHL 56 5 13 18 0.321 0.1078 0.1163 0.2974 0.3209
2017-18 Drumheller Dragons AJHL 55 5 20 25 0.455 0.1524 0.1559 0.4206 0.4302
2018-19 Drumheller Dragons AJHL 41 3 13 16 0.390 0.1309 0.1275 0.3611 0.3518
Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2023-24 Alaska Fairbanks D1 WCHA 29 2 4 6 0.207
2022-23 Maine D1 HockeyEast 19 0 2 2 0.105
2021-22 Maine D1 HockeyEast JR 22 1 3 4 0.182
2020-21 Maine D1 HockeyEast SO 10 0 2 2 0.200
2019-20 Maine D1 HockeyEast FR 4 0 0 0 0.000

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

48%
NCAA D1
5%
NCAA D2/D3
28%
Age-Out / Club
20%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#12897
Defenseman overall
#2275
Defenseman born in 1999
#1537
in AJHL

D1 Comparables

USHL · 2012-13 · 0.22 PPG
→ Lake Superior State (0.30 D1 FR PPG)
0.12 Average D
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.24 PPG
→ Minnesota Duluth (0.18 D1 FR PPG)
0.13 Average D
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.44 PPG
→ North Dakota (0.45 D1 FR PPG)
0.25 Strong D
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.29 PPG
→ UConn (0.10 D1 FR PPG)
0.16 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.45 PPG
→ Western Michigan (0.15 D1 FR PPG)
0.25 Average D
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Skidmore · 2014-15
0.680 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
SUNY Morrisville · 2018-19
0.000 No data
actual D2/3 PPG
Curry · 2013-14
0.353 Average
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.