IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Steve Gerbis Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 1999-06-29 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2017-18 Bridgewater Jr. Bandits USPHL-Elite 11 1 1 2 0.182 0.0169 0.0167 0.0416 0.0411
2018-19 Northeast Generals NA3HL 43 12 26 38 0.884 0.1126 0.1105 0.2795 0.2742
2019-20 Northeast Generals NA3HL 47 32 77 109 2.319 0.2955 0.2955 0.7335 0.7335
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2023-24 Morrisville D3 SUNYAC — 25 5 5 10 0.400
2023-24 SUNY Morrisville D3 SUNYAC SR 25 5 5 10 0.400
2022-23 SUNY Morrisville D3 SUNYAC JR 22 2 0 2 0.091
2021-22 SUNY Morrisville D3 SUNYAC SO 22 2 4 6 0.273
2020-21 SUNY Morrisville D3 SUNYAC FR 0 0 0 0 0.000

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

5%
NCAA D2/D3
0%
Club / ACHA
55%
Other

NCAAe Rankings

#14658
Forward overall
#696
Forward born in 1999

D1 Comparables

Ben Greiner
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.17 PPG
→ Bowling Green (0.38 D1 FR PPG)
0.10 Average
NCAAe PPG
Josh Erickson
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.21 PPG
→ Alaska Fairbanks (0.14 D1 FR PPG)
0.12 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Tyler Spezia
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.26 PPG
→ Bowling Green (0.25 D1 FR PPG)
0.15 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Zach Saar
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.33 PPG
→ Penn State (0.33 D1 FR PPG)
0.19 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Matt Pohlkamp
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.33 PPG
→ Bowling Green (0.41 D1 FR PPG)
0.19 Average
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Mike Wilson
Worcester State · 2017-18
0.500 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Lewis Crosby
St. Thomas · 2018-19
0.571 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Dimitris Christou
Franklin Pierce · 2018-19
0.000 No data
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.